SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
The Role of PBB in Service Provider Networks




                                 Nick Del Regno
                                 Principal Member of Technical Staff
                                 Verizon Core Network Technology
                                 nick.delregno@verizon.com



                   © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved        Page - 1
Agenda

 Verizon Ethernet Networks
 Provider Bridged Network Challenges
 PBB in Native Ethernet Networks
 VPLS Challenges
 PBB in VPLS Networks




                     © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 2
Verizon Ethernet Networks

  Switched Ethernet Service
  – LATA-bound Ethernet Service Network
  – EVPL, EP-LAN, EVP-LAN Services
  – Provider Bridging & Provider Backbone Bridging
  Converged Packet Architecture
  – National/Global Ethernet Service Network
  – EVPL, EP-LAN & EVP-LAN Services
  – VPLS & VPWS based services
  End-to-End Ethernet Solutions




                            © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 3
Provider Bridging Challenges




                            Ethertype
                   C-VLAN
       DA     SA     Tag                                       Payload       FCS




 VLAN ID Space Limitations
  – 12-bits = 4096 VLANs
 Customer VLAN Space Overlap
 Global Nature of VLANs
  – Switch
  – Network
 Historical lack of VLAN translation capability



                                        © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved         Page - 4
Early Solutions




                                     Ethertype
                    S-VLAN C-VLAN
       DA      SA     Tag    Tag                                    Payload   FCS



  VLAN Stacking
  – Q-in-Q
  – 802.1ad
  S-VLAN expands addressable VLAN space
  – 16,777,216 VLANs (4096 C-Tags x 4096 S-Tags)
  – Doesn’t help MAC Scaling
  S-VLAN often represents customer EVC
  – 4096 EVCs per network
  – Too few for large SP networks



                               © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved               Page - 5
Topological Considerations
                                (Possible)
                                MAC Choke
                                Points




  Early deployments
  – Flat Topologies
  – Tree & Branch Architectures
  Hierarchy Introduced to Scale
  – Improves MST convergence
  – Creates MAC scaling challenges
  – VLAN Scaling still limited
                            © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 6
Provider Backbone Bridging (802.1ah)




                                                                  Ethertype
                                                    C-VLAN
B-DA   B-SA   B-Tag   I-Tag   C-DA    C-SA            Tag                     Payload   FCS B-FCS



  MAC + Tag Stack
   – Backbone MACs pre-pended to packet
   – B-Tag is a VLAN Tag (EtherType: 0x88A8)
   – New I-Tag
       • EtherType: 0x88E7
       • Priority, Drop Eligibility and “Use Customer Addresses” Flags
       • 24-bit Service Instance ID = 16,777,216 IDs
  Introduces Backbone Tunnel Concept
   – Multipoint B-VIDs for ELAN traffic
   – Point-to-Point B-VIDs for ELINE traffic
  Hides customer MACs
   – C-MACs visible within PB switches and Backbone Edge Bridges
     (BEBs)

                                     © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved                      Page - 7
PBB in Provider Bridged Networks

                                                                                                                        No Customer MAC Visibility




                                             BCB                                              BCB




I-B Tagged Packets




                                                                                                         IB-BEB /
                                    IB-BEB                IB-BEB                     IB-BEB
                                                                                                           BCB




S-Tagged Packets


                     Legacy     Legacy       Legacy             Legacy             Legacy     Legacy                Legacy          Next Gen
                     Ethernet   Ethernet     Ethernet           Ethernet           Ethernet   Ethernet              Ethernet        Ethernet
                      Switch     Switch       Switch             Switch             Switch     Switch                Switch          Switch




                                                                      Customer Edge
C-Tagged Packets


                                                                                                                        BCB: Backbone Core Bridge
                                                                                                                        IB-BEB: Backbone Edge Bridge



                                                        © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved                                               Page - 8
PBB in Provider Bridged Networks

  Improved Scaling
  – No Customer MAC Visibility in Network Core
  – 16 Million Service IDs
  – Scalable Layer 2 Solution
     • MPLS/VPLS not required
  Works well with Multiple Registration Protocol
  – MMRP for MAC Registration
  – MVRP for VLAN Registration
  MSTP for Topology Management
  G.8031 for P2P Tunnels
  – 50mS resiliency for EVPL Traffic
  Well suited for Multicast/Broadcast vs. VPLS
  Simpler Evolution from PB networks vs. MPLS

                             © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 9
VPLS Challenges
                        PE                  PE




                PE                                                  PE

                              P            P


                PE                                                  PE




                             PE                     PE




 Requires Full Mesh of LSPs
  – LDP or RSVP-TE
  – 150 PEs results in over 22,000 LSPs
      • Not to mention Fast Reroute (FRR) Bypass/Detour LSPs
 Results in Full Mesh (or more) of Pseudowires
 Large networks result in LSP exhaust
  – Especially at Transit Locations
      • US <-> EMEA
      • US <-> APAC

                                   © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved    Page - 10
H-VPLS Scaling Solutions
                               PE                           PE



                                               MTU
                       PE                                                     PE

                               MTU                            MTU


                       PE                                                     PE
                                               MTU



                                    PE                              PE
             All Customer
             MACs visible at
             MTUs




  Dramatically Reduces Number of LSPs
  – Full Mesh Required between “MTUs”
  Reduces number of Pseudowires
  – PWs needed only between PE & MTU and between MTUs
  Creates MAC Address Choke Points
  – ALL Customer MACs visible at MTU
  – Can approach MAC scale limits of hierarchical boundary equipment

                                         © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved        Page - 11
PBB + HVPLS
                                    PE +                         PE +
                                     PE
                                   IB-BEB                         PE
                                                                IB-BEB




                                                     MTU
                    PE +                                                             PE +
                     PE
                   IB-BEB                                                             PE
                                                                                    IB-BEB


                                   MTU                              MTU

                    PE +                                                             PE +
                     PE
                   IB-BEB                                                             PE
                                                                                    IB-BEB
                                                     MTU



               No Customer             PE +                               PE +
                                      IB-BEB                               PE
                                                                         IB-BEB
               MAC visibility in
               VPLS core




 Leverage HVPLS to reduce LSP & PW scale
 Leverage PBB to reduce Customer MAC Scale
 PBB in the PE
  – Encapsulate customer traffic in PBB
  – MTU Devices only bridge on Backbone MAC Address
     • Similar to BCB function in Native Ethernet backbones
                                               © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved            Page - 12
PBB vs MPLS?

 No such thing
 Agnostic tool
  – Helps scale native Ethernet networks
  – Helps scale VPLS networks


 PBB-TE vs MPLS-TP = TBD




                            © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 13
Questions?




             © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved   Page - 14

More Related Content

What's hot

Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...EMC
 
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage NetworkingConverged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage NetworkingEMC
 
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)Johnson Liu
 
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kiev
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kievMellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kiev
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kievVolodymyr Saviak
 
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 Scalability
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 ScalabilityEthernet VPN - Layer 2 Scalability
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 ScalabilityShivlu Jain
 
Evdo rev b_web_10252011
Evdo rev b_web_10252011Evdo rev b_web_10252011
Evdo rev b_web_10252011lajetee47
 
2003 salih 3_gdata1
2003 salih 3_gdata12003 salih 3_gdata1
2003 salih 3_gdata1tapansaha26
 
Ethernet Private Line Sales Sheet
Ethernet Private Line Sales SheetEthernet Private Line Sales Sheet
Ethernet Private Line Sales SheetMallory Zemelis
 
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]Quantum Wimax
 
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN Services
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN ServicesWhite Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN Services
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN ServicesMetrodata Limited
 
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )EMC
 
Megkom Overview 2009
Megkom Overview 2009Megkom Overview 2009
Megkom Overview 2009Megkom
 

What's hot (17)

Unified MPLS
Unified MPLSUnified MPLS
Unified MPLS
 
Cupria QOS for video over IP
Cupria QOS for video over IPCupria QOS for video over IP
Cupria QOS for video over IP
 
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI, and the Future of Storage Networking ( EM...
 
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage NetworkingConverged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking
Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking
 
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
 
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kiev
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kievMellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kiev
Mellanox hpc update @ hpcday 2012 kiev
 
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 Scalability
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 ScalabilityEthernet VPN - Layer 2 Scalability
Ethernet VPN - Layer 2 Scalability
 
Evdo rev b_web_10252011
Evdo rev b_web_10252011Evdo rev b_web_10252011
Evdo rev b_web_10252011
 
2003 salih 3_gdata1
2003 salih 3_gdata12003 salih 3_gdata1
2003 salih 3_gdata1
 
Ethernet Private Line Sales Sheet
Ethernet Private Line Sales SheetEthernet Private Line Sales Sheet
Ethernet Private Line Sales Sheet
 
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]
White Paper for Alvarion’s 4Motion [QuantumWimax.com]
 
Cn pmp430 1214
Cn pmp430 1214Cn pmp430 1214
Cn pmp430 1214
 
Tandemtransitweb
TandemtransitwebTandemtransitweb
Tandemtransitweb
 
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN Services
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN ServicesWhite Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN Services
White Paper: IP VPN and Ethernet WAN Services
 
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )
FC/FCoE - Topologies, Protocols, and Limitations ( EMC World 2012 )
 
Megkom Overview 2009
Megkom Overview 2009Megkom Overview 2009
Megkom Overview 2009
 
Dvb s2-vcm
Dvb s2-vcmDvb s2-vcm
Dvb s2-vcm
 

Similar to 10 fn s23

Trill spb-comparison-extract
Trill spb-comparison-extractTrill spb-comparison-extract
Trill spb-comparison-extractIssacYuan
 
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204guestf6c708
 
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment Overview
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment OverviewCISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment Overview
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment OverviewAmeen Wayok
 
Infocom03 rajiv
Infocom03 rajivInfocom03 rajiv
Infocom03 rajivzt5169
 
MPLS in Mobile Backhaul
MPLS in Mobile BackhaulMPLS in Mobile Backhaul
MPLS in Mobile BackhaulScott Foster
 
VoIP Connectivity Table
VoIP Connectivity TableVoIP Connectivity Table
VoIP Connectivity TableBraun Mincher
 
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS PROIDEA
 
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010Michael Graves
 
Vxlan control plane and routing
Vxlan control plane and routingVxlan control plane and routing
Vxlan control plane and routingWilfredzeng
 
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_Webinar
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_WebinarIEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_Webinar
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_WebinarSymmetricomSYMM
 

Similar to 10 fn s23 (20)

Megis mpls
Megis mplsMegis mpls
Megis mpls
 
10 fn s21
10 fn s2110 fn s21
10 fn s21
 
Trill spb-comparison-extract
Trill spb-comparison-extractTrill spb-comparison-extract
Trill spb-comparison-extract
 
10209
1020910209
10209
 
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204
Ngn2004 Moving Up And To The Edges110204
 
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment Overview
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment OverviewCISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment Overview
CISCO Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Technical Deployment Overview
 
Infocom03 rajiv
Infocom03 rajivInfocom03 rajiv
Infocom03 rajiv
 
Intelligent Mobile Broadband
Intelligent Mobile BroadbandIntelligent Mobile Broadband
Intelligent Mobile Broadband
 
Why EoMPLS for CE
Why EoMPLS for CEWhy EoMPLS for CE
Why EoMPLS for CE
 
IIR VPN London
IIR VPN LondonIIR VPN London
IIR VPN London
 
MPLS in Mobile Backhaul
MPLS in Mobile BackhaulMPLS in Mobile Backhaul
MPLS in Mobile Backhaul
 
10 fn tut2
10 fn tut210 fn tut2
10 fn tut2
 
VoIP Connectivity Table
VoIP Connectivity TableVoIP Connectivity Table
VoIP Connectivity Table
 
SIEPON Alignment with Broadband Forum Requirements
SIEPON Alignment with Broadband Forum RequirementsSIEPON Alignment with Broadband Forum Requirements
SIEPON Alignment with Broadband Forum Requirements
 
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS
PLNOG 6: Maciej Konstantynowicz - Implementing Seamless MPLS
 
BT multicast plans 2007
BT multicast plans 2007BT multicast plans 2007
BT multicast plans 2007
 
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010
Acme Packet Presentation Materials for VUC June 18th 2010
 
Vxlan control plane and routing
Vxlan control plane and routingVxlan control plane and routing
Vxlan control plane and routing
 
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_Webinar
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_WebinarIEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_Webinar
IEEE 1588 Timing for Mobile Backhaul_Webinar
 
10 fn s43
10 fn s4310 fn s43
10 fn s43
 

More from Scott Foster (20)

10 fn tut3
10 fn tut310 fn tut3
10 fn tut3
 
10 fn tut1
10 fn tut110 fn tut1
10 fn tut1
 
10 fn s48
10 fn s4810 fn s48
10 fn s48
 
10 fn s47
10 fn s4710 fn s47
10 fn s47
 
10 fn s46
10 fn s4610 fn s46
10 fn s46
 
10 fn s45
10 fn s4510 fn s45
10 fn s45
 
10 fn s44
10 fn s4410 fn s44
10 fn s44
 
10 fn s42
10 fn s4210 fn s42
10 fn s42
 
10 fn s40
10 fn s4010 fn s40
10 fn s40
 
10 fn s38
10 fn s3810 fn s38
10 fn s38
 
10 fn s37
10 fn s3710 fn s37
10 fn s37
 
10 fn s36
10 fn s3610 fn s36
10 fn s36
 
10 fn s35
10 fn s3510 fn s35
10 fn s35
 
10 fn s34
10 fn s3410 fn s34
10 fn s34
 
10 fn s33
10 fn s3310 fn s33
10 fn s33
 
10 fn s32
10 fn s3210 fn s32
10 fn s32
 
10 fn s31
10 fn s3110 fn s31
10 fn s31
 
10 fn s29
10 fn s2910 fn s29
10 fn s29
 
10 fn s28
10 fn s2810 fn s28
10 fn s28
 
10 fn s26
10 fn s2610 fn s26
10 fn s26
 

10 fn s23

  • 1. The Role of PBB in Service Provider Networks Nick Del Regno Principal Member of Technical Staff Verizon Core Network Technology nick.delregno@verizon.com © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 1
  • 2. Agenda Verizon Ethernet Networks Provider Bridged Network Challenges PBB in Native Ethernet Networks VPLS Challenges PBB in VPLS Networks © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 2
  • 3. Verizon Ethernet Networks Switched Ethernet Service – LATA-bound Ethernet Service Network – EVPL, EP-LAN, EVP-LAN Services – Provider Bridging & Provider Backbone Bridging Converged Packet Architecture – National/Global Ethernet Service Network – EVPL, EP-LAN & EVP-LAN Services – VPLS & VPWS based services End-to-End Ethernet Solutions © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 3
  • 4. Provider Bridging Challenges Ethertype C-VLAN DA SA Tag Payload FCS VLAN ID Space Limitations – 12-bits = 4096 VLANs Customer VLAN Space Overlap Global Nature of VLANs – Switch – Network Historical lack of VLAN translation capability © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 4
  • 5. Early Solutions Ethertype S-VLAN C-VLAN DA SA Tag Tag Payload FCS VLAN Stacking – Q-in-Q – 802.1ad S-VLAN expands addressable VLAN space – 16,777,216 VLANs (4096 C-Tags x 4096 S-Tags) – Doesn’t help MAC Scaling S-VLAN often represents customer EVC – 4096 EVCs per network – Too few for large SP networks © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 5
  • 6. Topological Considerations (Possible) MAC Choke Points Early deployments – Flat Topologies – Tree & Branch Architectures Hierarchy Introduced to Scale – Improves MST convergence – Creates MAC scaling challenges – VLAN Scaling still limited © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 6
  • 7. Provider Backbone Bridging (802.1ah) Ethertype C-VLAN B-DA B-SA B-Tag I-Tag C-DA C-SA Tag Payload FCS B-FCS MAC + Tag Stack – Backbone MACs pre-pended to packet – B-Tag is a VLAN Tag (EtherType: 0x88A8) – New I-Tag • EtherType: 0x88E7 • Priority, Drop Eligibility and “Use Customer Addresses” Flags • 24-bit Service Instance ID = 16,777,216 IDs Introduces Backbone Tunnel Concept – Multipoint B-VIDs for ELAN traffic – Point-to-Point B-VIDs for ELINE traffic Hides customer MACs – C-MACs visible within PB switches and Backbone Edge Bridges (BEBs) © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 7
  • 8. PBB in Provider Bridged Networks No Customer MAC Visibility BCB BCB I-B Tagged Packets IB-BEB / IB-BEB IB-BEB IB-BEB BCB S-Tagged Packets Legacy Legacy Legacy Legacy Legacy Legacy Legacy Next Gen Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Ethernet Switch Switch Switch Switch Switch Switch Switch Switch Customer Edge C-Tagged Packets BCB: Backbone Core Bridge IB-BEB: Backbone Edge Bridge © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 8
  • 9. PBB in Provider Bridged Networks Improved Scaling – No Customer MAC Visibility in Network Core – 16 Million Service IDs – Scalable Layer 2 Solution • MPLS/VPLS not required Works well with Multiple Registration Protocol – MMRP for MAC Registration – MVRP for VLAN Registration MSTP for Topology Management G.8031 for P2P Tunnels – 50mS resiliency for EVPL Traffic Well suited for Multicast/Broadcast vs. VPLS Simpler Evolution from PB networks vs. MPLS © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 9
  • 10. VPLS Challenges PE PE PE PE P P PE PE PE PE Requires Full Mesh of LSPs – LDP or RSVP-TE – 150 PEs results in over 22,000 LSPs • Not to mention Fast Reroute (FRR) Bypass/Detour LSPs Results in Full Mesh (or more) of Pseudowires Large networks result in LSP exhaust – Especially at Transit Locations • US <-> EMEA • US <-> APAC © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 10
  • 11. H-VPLS Scaling Solutions PE PE MTU PE PE MTU MTU PE PE MTU PE PE All Customer MACs visible at MTUs Dramatically Reduces Number of LSPs – Full Mesh Required between “MTUs” Reduces number of Pseudowires – PWs needed only between PE & MTU and between MTUs Creates MAC Address Choke Points – ALL Customer MACs visible at MTU – Can approach MAC scale limits of hierarchical boundary equipment © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 11
  • 12. PBB + HVPLS PE + PE + PE IB-BEB PE IB-BEB MTU PE + PE + PE IB-BEB PE IB-BEB MTU MTU PE + PE + PE IB-BEB PE IB-BEB MTU No Customer PE + PE + IB-BEB PE IB-BEB MAC visibility in VPLS core Leverage HVPLS to reduce LSP & PW scale Leverage PBB to reduce Customer MAC Scale PBB in the PE – Encapsulate customer traffic in PBB – MTU Devices only bridge on Backbone MAC Address • Similar to BCB function in Native Ethernet backbones © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 12
  • 13. PBB vs MPLS? No such thing Agnostic tool – Helps scale native Ethernet networks – Helps scale VPLS networks PBB-TE vs MPLS-TP = TBD © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 13
  • 14. Questions? © Verizon 2010 All Rights Reserved Page - 14